However, the school district faces significant potential budget cuts as DOGE impacts school food funding
Recently, the Trump administrationâs professed zeal for cutting âwaste, fraud, and abuseâ in federal spending resulted in the announcement of massive cuts to USDA proÂgrams such as sourcing local foods for school meals and food banks. According to recent reporting from The Denver Post, Colorado stands to lose $13.1 million in such funding. Now, schools and food banks around Colorado, as well as the rest of the country, are scrambling to replace that funding.
âWe donât know whatâs going on,â said Custer County School Superintendent Thom Peck: âThe USDA oversees breakfast, lunch, and snack programs.â
The state of Colorado has its own free school lunch proÂgram, Healthy Meals for All, administered through the ColoÂrado Department of Education (CDE). This program, unlike the federal free and reduced lunch program, is not income-based â it is open to all students regardless of income. Peck noted that this is a complicating factor in calculating losses from federal program cuts. â[Federal] Title I fundÂing is based on numbers of students qualifying for free and reduced lunch â but since Colorado decided that every kid gets free lunch, it messes with Title I money. Because our parents didnât have to fill out the forms for free and reduced lunch, we didnât have an accurate number [for qualifying students]. Documentation of financial need went way down, so that means a reduction in funds.â
However, local food sourcing for such Custer County School meal items as beef will continue, partly as a local decision, partly as a result of a state law passed in 2019, HB 19-1132, allowing CDE and other state agencies to disÂtribute financial incentives to food banks and schools that source fresh food and produce from local farmers and ranchÂers. âWe are going to use local beef that is processed by a USDA processor,â Peck said.
Among the other headaches for school administrators to deal with, besides the USDA cuts, are the Trump administraÂtionâs threats to the federal Department of Education (DOE) funding â threats that include getting rid of the DOE altogether. âTitle I funding is six percent of our general fund budget,â Peck said: âbut thatâs only part of the issue. Federal money is also part of the big grants that CDE oversees. If those get cut, we are in trouble. It would eliminate training programs for teachers. I have five paraprofessionals that want to pursue teacher training. These grants help pay for alternate licensing.â
Peck cited another program called Project Lead the Way, which funds STEM curriculum planning and implementaÂtion: âWe have two $20,000 grants from the state for this program. Where does that money come from? The feds!â
As for knock-on effects from federal funding cuts, Peck said, â75 percent of our general fund is salaries and beneÂfits. A reduction in funding means reducing staff. Classroom sizes go up â you become less effective. And if we canât do free breakfast or snack anymore â kids wonât be at their best for learning and behavior.â
When asked whether most of the Custer County stuÂdents come in and eat breakfast at school, Peck grinned and replied, âYes â but it depends on the breakfast! Monday morning cereal doesnât get them that excited, but Thursday morning biscuits and gravy sure does!â
(The Tribune will continue to report on the effects of federal budget cuts on the school and other organizations around the county and the state.)
â Elliot Jackson